Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
EBioMedicine ; 97: 104814, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ivermectin's mosquitocidal effect and in vitro activity against Plasmodium falciparum asexual stages are known. Its in vivo blood-schizonticidal efficacy is unknown. Ivermectin's tolerability and efficacy against P. falciparum infections in Gabonese adults were assessed. METHODS: The study consisted of a multiple dose stage and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled stage. Adults with asymptomatic P. falciparum parasitaemia (200-5000 parasites/µl) were enrolled. First, three groups of five participants received 200 µg/kg ivermectin once daily for one, two, and three days, respectively, and then 34 participants were randomized to 300 µg/kg ivermectin or placebo once daily for 3 days. Primary efficacy outcome was time to 90% parasite reduction. Primary safety outcomes were drug-related serious and severe adverse events (Trial registration: PACTR201908520097051). FINDINGS: Between June 2019 and October 2020, 49 participants were enrolled. Out of the 34 randomized participants, 29 (85%) completed the trial as per protocol. No severe or serious adverse events were observed. The median time to 90% parasite reduction was 24.1 vs. 32.0 h in the ivermectin and placebo groups, respectively (HR 1.38 [95% CI 0.64 to 2.97]). INTERPRETATION: Ivermectin was well tolerated in doses up to 300 µg/kg once daily for three days and asymptomatic P. falciparum asexual parasitaemia was reduced similarly with this dose of ivermectin compared to placebo. Further studies are needed to evaluate plasmodicidal effect of ivermectin at higher doses and in larger samples. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné and the Centre for Tropical Medicine of the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria, Falciparum , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Ivermectin/adverse effects , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Malaria, Falciparum/parasitology , Pilot Projects , Plasmodium falciparum
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 17(8): e0011584, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37639396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of systematic evidence for strategies to control loiasis transmission in highly endemic regions. Here we assessed albendazole and ivermectin based treatment regimens to reduce Loa loa microfilaraemia in Gabon. METHODS: Eligible adult patients with L. loa microfilaraemia between 5,000 and 50,000 microfilariae/ml were randomized to either a control or one of three intervention groups (1:2:2:2 allocation ratio) consisting of three-week twice daily 400mg oral albendazole followed by 1) no treatment, 2) two further weeks of twice daily 400mg albendazole, or 3) a single dose of ivermectin in this open label randomized assessor blinded controlled clinical trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with L. loa microfilaraemia ≤ 100 mf/ml at Day 168. RESULTS: In the efficacy-population of 42 patients 0 (0%; control group), 1 (9%; 3-week albendazole), 5 (39%; 5-weeks albendazole) and 2 (22%; 3-week albendazole plus single dose ivermectin) participants met the primary outcome of microfilaraemia below 100/ml at day 168. A 80-90% reduction of microfilaraemia was observed in the active treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The 5-week regimen of albendazole or a 3-week regimen of albendazole followed by ivermectin were most efficacious to reduce microfilaraemia. All therapeutic regimens were well tolerated and safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered at the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR201807197019027.


Subject(s)
Albendazole , Loiasis , Humans , Adult , Animals , Albendazole/adverse effects , Ivermectin/adverse effects , Gabon , Loiasis/drug therapy , Clinical Protocols , Fishes
3.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(10): e0010899, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36315579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urogenital schistosomiasis is prevalent in many malaria endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa and can lead to long-term health consequences if untreated. Antimalarial drugs used to treat uncomplicated malaria have shown to exert some activity against Schistosoma haematobium. Here, we explore the efficacy on concomitant urogenital schistosomiasis of first-line recommended artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) and investigational second-generation ACTs when administered for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Gabon. METHODS: Microscopic determination of urogenital schistosomiasis was performed from urine samples collected from patients with confirmed uncomplicated malaria. Egg excretion reduction rate and cure rate were determined at 4-weeks and 6-weeks post-treatment with either artesunate-pyronaridine, artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-amodiaquine or artefenomel-ferroquine. RESULTS: Fifty-two (16%) out of 322 malaria patients were co-infected with urogenital schistosomiasis and were treated with antimalarial drug combinations. Schistosoma haematobium egg excretion rates showed a median reduction of 100% (interquartile range (IQR), 17% to 100%) and 65% (IQR, -133% to 100%) at 4-weeks and 6-weeks post-treatment, respectively, in the artesunate-pyronaridine group (n = 20) compared to 35% (IQR, -250% to 70%) and 65% (IQR, -65% to 79%) in the artemether-lumefantrine group (n = 18). Artesunate-amodiaquine (n = 2) and artefenomel-ferroquine combination (n = 3) were not able to reduce the rate of eggs excreted in this limited number of patients. In addition, cure rates were 56% and 37% at 4- and 6-weeks post-treatment, respectively, with artesunate-pyronaridine and no cases of cure were observed for the other antimalarial combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Antimalarial treatments with artesunate-pyronaridine and artemether-lumefantrine reduced the excretion of S. haematobium eggs, comforting the hypothesis that antimalarial drugs could play a role in the control of schistosomiasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, under the Identifier NCT04264130.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria, Falciparum , Malaria , Schistosomiasis haematobia , Humans , Amodiaquine/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artemether , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Artesunate/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Ethanolamines/therapeutic use , Gabon/epidemiology , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria, Falciparum/complications , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Schistosomiasis haematobia/complications , Schistosomiasis haematobia/drug therapy
4.
Blood Adv ; 6(21): 5798-5810, 2022 11 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35349634

ABSTRACT

Severe malarial anemia (SMA) is the main cause of malaria-associated infant mortality in malaria endemic countries. One major factor that contributes to SMA is the accumulation of uninfected red blood cells (uRBCs) in the spleen. We report the activation of adhesion molecules Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule (Lu/BCAM) and CD44 on uRBCs from Plasmodium falciparum in vitro cultures and patients with malaria that mediates adherence to the splenic extracellular matrix (ECM) components laminin-α5 and hyaluronic acid (HA), respectively. This tight ECM-adhesion molecule interaction was associated with elevated intracellular Ca2+ levels, increased shedding of microvesicles, and Lu/BCAM clustering on altered uRBCs. Moreover, we observed that a soluble parasite-derived factor promoted the adhesive phenotype of uRBCs, as the incubation of RBCs with filtered malaria-conditioned medium reproduced the same adhesive effect in malaria culture-derived uRBCs. Eventually, Lu/BCAM and CD44 activation facilitate the adherence to ECM components of the red pulp, resulting in the enhanced splenic retention of uRBCs. Our results suggest a novel adhesion molecule-dependent mechanism that augments malaria-induced anemia.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Malaria , Humans , Lutheran Blood-Group System/metabolism , Cell Adhesion Molecules/genetics , Erythrocytes/metabolism
5.
EClinicalMedicine ; 42: 101184, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34765956

ABSTRACT

Background: Clinical scores for sepsis have been primarily developed for, and applied in High-Income Countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the performance of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) scores for diagnosis and prediction of mortality in patients with suspected infection in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched until May 18, 2021. Studies reporting the performance of at least one of the above-mentioned scores for predicting mortality in patients of 15 years of age and older with suspected infection or sepsis were eligible. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. PRISMA guidelines were followed (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020153906). The bivariate random-effects regression model was used to pool the individual sensitivities, specificities and areas-under-the-curve (AUC). Findings: Twenty-four articles (of 5669 identified) with 27,237 patients were eligible for inclusion. qSOFA pooled sensitivity was 0·70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0·60-0·78), specificity 0·73 (95% CI 0·67-0·79), and AUC 0·77 (95% CI 0·72-0·82). SIRS pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0·88 (95% CI 0·79 -0·93), 0·34 (95% CI 0·25-0·44), and 0·69 (95% CI 0·50-0·83), respectively. MEWS pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0·70 (95% CI 0·57 -0·81), 0·61 (95% CI 0·42-0·77), and 0·72 (95% CI 0·64-0·77), respectively. UVA pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0·49 (95% CI 0·33 -0·65), 0·91(95% CI 0·84-0·96), and 0·76 (95% CI 0·44-0·93), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the pooled analysis. Interpretation: Individual score performances ranged from poor to acceptable. Future studies should combine selected or modified elements of different scores. Funding: Partially funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (17/63/42).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...